Two well-known figures have generated heated public discussion in a week full of conflicting entertainment news: 20-year-old singer Jessie Murph and renowned actress Elizabeth Hurley. Each woman has been the subject of intense scrutiny due to content that some public segments have labelled inappropriate, explicit, and disturbing.
Jessie Murph and the criticism of the “1965” music video
A budding artist with a bold edge
Because of her vocal style and emotional sensitivity, Jessie Murph, who gained prominence on TikTok and YouTube, has frequently been likened to the late Amy Winehouse. Yet, that vulnerability has been taken to even darker extremes in the most recent release, “1965,” from her second studio album, Sex Hysteria.
What is shown in the video?
The 1965 music video, which was released on July 18, has received harsh criticism for scenes that many believe glorify pornography and domestic abuse. The most startling parts consist of:
- An explicit sexual scene in the middle of the video.
- A woman on a couch, face down and bound, who was probably Murph.
- the child’s appearance right before the explicit material.
Fans have expressed their disapproval on social media and in the YouTube comments section. The video has received over 7 million views, which has only increased the outrage.
“This is diabolical… I will always be traumatised.”
|— YouTube viewer comments
“How does YouTube permit pornography?”
|— Another astonished spectator
Dubious lyrics exacerbate the situation.
Murph’s 1965 lyrics, which included phrases like:
- “You wouldn’t hit me on Snapchat, but I might get a little slap-slap.”
- “If you would just love me like it’s 1965, I think I’d give up a few rights.”
Numerous viewers demanded that the video be removed or subjected to stricter censorship because they thought the lyrics romanticised abuse and unhealthy relationships.
“This can still be unreleased.”
|— YouTube fan response
Damage to one’s reputation?
Murph, who was once praised for her unvarnished, passionate songwriting, is currently experiencing a crisis with her reputation. One fan has severely criticised the Amy Winehouse comparisons, saying:
“Who the hell is comparing this to Amy? You should all feel embarrassed.
The mother-son partnership among Elizabeth Hurley and “Strictly Confidential” is causing controversy.
Elizabeth Hurley – The mother-son collaboration raising eyebrows
A mistake or a cinematic experiment?
Elizabeth Hurley is under examination for her part in the erotic thriller Strictly Confidential, which was directed by her 22-year-old son Damian Hurley, while Jessie Murph received critique for her use of explicit imagery in her songs.
Hurley plays Lily, a distraught mother caught up in a web of betrayal, sex, and mystery after her daughter commits suicide, in the movie, which is currently accessible on VOD.
What is controversial?
Hurley and her son’s sapphic sex scene is the most talked-about part of the movie. Critics are questioning whether such a collaboration is appropriate, and the dynamic alone has drawn public attention.
Elizabeth Hurley answers
Elizabeth Hurley answered to the public’s attention by defending the scene on The View and in multiple outlets such as People Magazine and The Telegraph:
- Hurley dismissed the unease of the public by saying, “It wasn’t a big deal at all.”
- She emphasised that everyone felt respected and safe, and that there was no nudity.
- “Come on, let’s shoot it!” was the motto of the fast-paced, closed-set filming.
- She praised her son’s professionalism and even called the experience “liberating.”
“He wasn’t sneaking into my bedroom; he was guiding me.”
|On The View, Elizabeth Hurley
“I felt secure. He took care of me.
|— Hurley, Hollywood Access
Speaking up, Damian Hurley
Damian supported the project despite acknowledging the controversy:
- Referred to it as a professional set where “every second counts.”
- Explained that although they lacked an intimacy coordinator, their independent, small-scale film didn’t require one.
- Emphasised that working with his mother felt natural given their industry experience and that it was all a part of the creative process.
“We felt comfortable.”
|— Hurley Damian
Artistic audacity or softcore drama?
Set in a luxurious Caribbean villa, Strictly Confidential features extravagant sets, vibrant beachwear, and exaggerated melodrama. Hurley’s performance is characterised as sultry, powerful, and purposefully soap operatic.
Themes of betrayal, eroticism, loss, and secrets are at the heart of the story. Critics have compared it to silly daytime the news or quirky movies like Michael Flatley’s Blackbird, describing it as:
- “Too much data”
- “Too much Freud”
- “Just a bit too much.”
- What is the boundary?
Where do we draw the line?
Under the pretence of artistic freedom, Elizabeth Hurley’s Strictly Confidential and Jessie Murph’s 1965 both test the limits of what viewers are prepared to tolerate. Both women are breaking industry taboos or expressing difficult truths, according to their supporters. However, some critics view these pieces as tone deaf, gratuitous, or exploitative.
The distinction between art and shock value appears to be becoming more obscure in the era of social media, where every creative choice is immediately analysed.
Concluding remarks
Public response shows that people are still highly invested in the messages that artists convey, whether it’s via shocking music videos or films that break taboos. Though their daring decisions have certainly caused heated debates, Jessie Murph and Elizabeth Hurley may not have meant to start firestorms.
It stays to be seen if the criticism changes their careers or strengthens their standing as trailblazers in their fields.
Note: We got Information from News AU site but write this article according to my personal thoughts.
